How Africa is Shining a Spotlight on the Faults of Humanitarian Communication
Africa seems to be
the target of humanitarian communication’s downfalls and Annas (1997) highlights
its consistent depiction: “In general, war, famine, racial conflict, abuse of
power, corruption and a lack of planning characterise the image of Africa.” Africa’s
portrayal is overwhelmingly negative and its identity lies in the issues it faces
rather than what it has to offer or the value of its people. In many ways, the
continent is a microcosm for the issues at the centre of development media. This
piece will explore how, through looking at Africa’s media representation, we
can understand and contextualise key conceptual issues at the heart of
humanitarian communication.
POVERTY PORNOGRAPHY:
Poverty Pornography
is a technique used in humanitarian communication and most commonly in charity
and NGO campaigns. The key objective is to invoke feelings of ‘guilt and pity’ through
using explicit and graphic images of the effects of poverty (Cameron and
Haanstra, 2008). This picture, part of a Save the Children campaign, clearly
depicts poverty pornography. The charity has numerous long-term appeals and emergency response
schemes in Africa, and employs such images to provoke quick monetary responses
from western citizens. This in itself raises questions of morality over
capturing suffering for financial purposes.
The Wider Consequences
This particular
image aims to create a personal connection with those who see it – the hand
reaching out acts as a cry for help to which people are expected and compelled
to respond. However, Cohen (2001) states, “The powerful north wants to know and
possess the submissive south.” This is reflected in this picture of a
‘helpless’ African child which plays on the ‘white saviour’ complex. Through responding
to this campaign, westerners feel as though they have a degree of power that
people like the child pictured do not. It raises the question – is there ever a
selfless good deed?
Furthermore, the
extensive issues raised by poverty pornography are universal, spanning across
humanitarian communication culture. These images may also fuel compassion
fatigue - a decreased sense of empathy and compassion from western populations
towards the other countries due to “the repeated use of the same disaster
narratives in the media” (Scott, 2014). The multitude of explicit ‘poverty
pornography’ images has created an immunity towards the suffering of those in
developing countries and therefore decreased campaign effectiveness.
CELEBRITY HUMANITARIANISM:
Celebrity humanitarianism is another promotion technique, which
again aids Africa’s negative image and stereotype. Brockington and Henson
(2015) use the umbrella term ‘celebrity advocacy’ for a variety of activities
that aim to raise awareness or money for a particular cause. The image shows Madonna in Malawi as part of her charity
‘Raising Malawi’; it demonstrates the issues associated with
celebrity advocacy. It’s as if Madonna is holding the child at arm’s length and
the angle at which she is kneeling makes it seem as though she is ‘above’ the
children, not only literally but also hierarchically. Her charity supports
children through the sectors of health, education and community development,
yet her interaction with the children in this picture depicts Madonna as the
‘saviour’ amongst a sea of African children.
Motives
and Morality
Although not intentional, it does reflect a lot of popular
concerns about celebrity involvement in humanitarian communication in terms of
the agenda or motives behind charitable actions. Brockington and Henson
(2015) emphasise this by saying
it would be wrong to believe that celebrity humanitarianism is purely for
selfish gain, however “the celebrity can often do better out of this attention
than their causes.”
Brockington and Henson (2015) carried out interviews as part of their research
and one interviewee suggested that surely if by using celebrity humanitarianism
you raise money for a cause in need, then the motive is unimportant? On the
other hand, is it ethically ok to use a celebrity to draw attention to issues
in countries such as Africa at the expense of, for example, Malawi’s image and
portrayal to Western citizens? It is likely that these sorts of campaigns
exacerbate the issue of Africa’s predominantly negative characterisation.
MOVING
FORWARD
Africa’s negative representation within western media is bound within a
web of
intricacies. Yet this is true for many other areas of the developing
world. Humanitarian communication has the power to raise awareness and shed
light on important global issues, yet this comes with the responsibility of
shaping people’s knowledge and opinion which can quickly be negatively
manipulated. As long as media continues using its current methods, it will be
difficult to shift and change the stereotypes that characterise places such as
Africa.
Annas. R., 1997. News
flows out of Africa: are Western media striving for excellence in communication
standards? ECQUID NOVI, 18:2,
pp196-208, DOI: 10.1080/02560054.1997.9653203
Brockington. D, Henson. S., 2015. Signifying the Public: Celebrity advocacy and post-democratic politics. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (4), pp431-448.
Cameron.J, Haanstra.A, Development Made Sexy: how it happened and what it means. Third World Quarterly. 29 (8), pp1475-1489.
Cohen, S., 2001. States
of Denial. s.l. Cambridge:Polity Press.
Scott, M., 2014. Media and
Development. London: Zed Books Ltd.
Pictures:
http://www.wbur.org/npr/439162849/at-what-point-does-a-fundraising-ad-go-too-far
https://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/11/showbiz/malawi-madonna-feud/index.html
Comments
Post a Comment